Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Rejection Surveillance After Cardiac Transplantation in the Australian Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is an effective treatment for end-stage congestive heart failure, however, achieving the right balance of immunosuppression to maintain graft function while minimising adverse effects is challenging. Serial endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) are currently the standard for rejection surveillance, despite being invasive. Replacing EMB-based surveillance with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-based surveillance for acute cardiac allograft rejection has shown feasibility. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of CMR-based surveillance in the first year after heart transplantation. METHOD: A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 40 orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients. Participants were randomly allocated into two surveillance groups: EMB-based, and CMR-based. The trial included economic evaluations, comparing the frequency and cost of surveillance modalities in relation to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) within the first year post-transplantation. Sensitivity analysis encompassed modelled data from observed EMB and CMR arms, integrating two hypothetical models of expedited CMR-based surveillance. RESULTS: In the CMR cohort, 238 CMR scans and 15 EMBs were conducted, versus (vs) 235 EMBs in the EMB group. CMR surveillance yielded comparable rejection rates (CMR 74 vs EMB 94 events, p=0.10) and did not increase hospitalisation risk (CMR 32 vs EMB 46 events, p=0.031). It significantly reduced the necessity for invasive EMBs by 94%, lowered costs by an average of AUD$32,878.61, and enhanced cumulative QALY by 0.588 compared with EMB. Sensitivity analysis showed that increased surveillance with expedited CMR Models 1 and 2 were more cost-effective than EMB (all p<0.01), with CMR Model 1 achieving the greatest cost savings (AUD$34,091.12±AUD$23,271.86 less) and utility increase (+0.62±1.49 QALYs, p=0.011), signifying an optimal cost-utility ratio. Model 2 showed comparable utility to the base CMR model (p=0.900) while offering the benefit of heightened surveillance frequency during periods of elevated rejection risk. CONCLUSIONS: CMR-based rejection surveillance in orthotopic heart transplant recipients provides a cost-effective alternative to EMB-based surveillance. Furthermore, it reduces the need for invasive procedures, without increased risk of rejection or hospitalisation for patients, and can be incorporated economically for expedited surveillance. These findings have important implications for improving patient care and optimising resource allocation in post-transplant management.

The Relationship Between Rehabilitation and Frailty in Advanced Heart or Lung Disease.

Background: Frailty increases morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced heart and lung disease. Emerging evidence shows that postoperative cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation can improve the frailty status of these patients. The aim of this hypothesis-generating study was to test the relationship between prehabilitation and frailty in patients with advanced heart or lung disease referred for heart and lung transplantation. Methods: The study was a retrospective audit of consecutive patients with advanced heart or lung disease referred for transplant assessment between January 2021 and December 2022. Frailty scores were recorded using Fried's frailty phenotype (range, 0-5), and rehabilitation status of patients at the time of frailty assessment was recorded. Results: Of 286 patients, 124 patients had advanced heart disease (mean age 53 ±â€…12 y; 82% men) and 162 patients had advanced lung disease (mean age 55 ±â€…12 y; 43% men). Sixty-nine (24%) patients were robust (score 0), 156 (55%) were prefrail (score, 1-2), and 61 (21%) were frail (score, 3-5). Eighty-two (29%) patients participated in hospital-based rehabilitation, 72 (25%) in home-based rehabilitation, and 132 (46%) in no rehabilitation. Frailty scores were significantly lower in patients participating in hospital-based or home-based rehabilitation compared with patients not participating in rehabilitation (0.8 ± 1.0 versus 0.8 ± 0.9 versus 2.3±1.2, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This study shows that patients participating in cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation are less frail compared with patients not participating in rehabilitation. These findings suggest that prehabilitation could be beneficial for patients awaiting heart or lung transplantation.

Understanding Tricuspid Regurgitation Post Cardiac Transplantation; Why "Anatomical" and "Functional" Just Won't Cut It.

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common after cardiac transplantation and results in poorer outcomes. Transplant recipients are at high prohibitive risk for redo surgical procedures because of risks associated with a subsequent sternotomy, immunosuppression, and renal failure. Percutaneous therapies have recently become available and may be an option for transplant recipients. However, transplant recipients have complex geometry, and there is a myriad of causes of TR posttransplant. There is a need for careful patient selection for all percutaneous valve interventions, and this is particularly true in transplant recipients who suffer from right ventricular failure and rejection and may undergo repeated endomyocardial biopsies. Cognizant of the rapid developments in this space, this review article focuses on the causes of TR, treatments, and future therapies in heart transplantation recipients to the transplant cardiologist navigate this complex area.

Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) safely and effectively extends acceptable donor heart preservation times: Results of the Australian and New Zealand trial.

BACKGROUND: Cold static storage preservation of donor hearts for periods longer than 4 hours increases the risk of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). The aim of the study was to determine if hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) could safely prolong the preservation time of donor hearts. METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter investigation of the effect of HOPE using the XVIVO Heart Preservation System on donor hearts with a projected preservation time of 6 to 8 hours on 30-day recipient survival and allograft function post-transplant. Each center completed 1 or 2 short preservation time followed by long preservation time cases. PGD was classified as occurring in the first 24 hours after transplantation or secondary graft dysfunction (SGD) occurring at any time with a clearly defined cause. Trial survival was compared with a comparator group based on data from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry. RESULTS: We performed heart transplants using 7 short and 29 long preservation time donor hearts placed on the HOPE system. The mean preservation time for the long preservation time cases was 414 minutes, the longest being 8 hours and 47 minutes. There was 100% survival at 30 days. One long preservation time recipient developed PGD, and 1 developed SGD. One short preservation time patient developed SGD. Thirty day survival was superior to the ISHLT comparator group despite substantially longer preservation times in the trial patients. CONCLUSIONS: HOPE provides effective preservation out to preservation times of nearly 9 hours allowing retrieval from remote geographic locations.

Major adverse kidney events predict reduced survival in ventricular assist device supported patients.

AIMS: There is limited data describing major adverse kidney events (MAKE) in patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VAD). We aim to describe the association between MAKE and survival, risk factors for MAKE, and renal trajectory in VAD supported patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of consecutive VAD implants between 2010 and 2019. Baseline demographics, biochemistry, and adverse events were collected for the duration of VAD support. MAKE was defined as the first event to occur of sustained drop (>50%) in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), progression to stage V chronic kidney disease, initiation or continuation of renal replacement therapy beyond implant admission or death on renal replacement therapy at any time. One-hundred and seventy-three patients were included, median age 56.8 years, 18.5% female, INTERMACS profile 1 or 2 in 75.1%. Thirty-seven patients experienced MAKE. On multivariate analysis, post-implant clinical right ventricular failure and the presence of chronic haemolysis, defined by the presence of schistocytes on blood film analysis, were significantly associated with increased risk of MAKE (adjusted odds ratio 9.88, P < 0.001 and adjusted odds ratio 3.33, P = 0.006, respectively). MAKE was associated with reduced survival (hazard ratio 4.80, P < 0.001). Patients who died or experienced MAKE did not demonstrate the expected transient 3-month improvement in eGFR, seen in other cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: MAKE significantly impacts survival. In our cohort, MAKE was predicted by post-implant right ventricular failure and chronic haemolysis. The lack of early eGFR improvement on VAD support may indicate higher risk for MAKE.

DMD-Associated Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Genotypes, Phenotypes, and Phenocopies.

BACKGROUND: Variants in the DMD gene, that encodes the cytoskeletal protein, dystrophin, cause a severe form of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) associated with high rates of heart failure, heart transplantation, and ventricular arrhythmias. Improved early detection of individuals at risk is needed. METHODS: Genetic testing of 40 male probands with a potential X-linked genetic cause of primary DCM was undertaken using multi-gene panel sequencing, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, and array comparative genomic hybridization. Variant location was assessed with respect to dystrophin isoform patterns and exon usage. Telomere length was evaluated as a marker of myocardial dysfunction in left ventricular tissue and blood. RESULTS: Four pathogenic/likely pathogenic DMD variants were found in 5 probands (5/40: 12.5%). Only one rare variant was identified by gene panel testing with 3 additional multi-exon deletion/duplications found following targeted assays for structural variants. All of the pathogenic/likely pathogenic DMD variants involved dystrophin exons that had percent spliced-in scores >90, indicating high levels of constitutive expression in the human adult heart. Fifteen DMD variant-negative probands (15/40: 37.5%) had variants in autosomal genes including TTN, BAG3, LMNA, and RBM20. Myocardial telomere length was reduced in patients with DCM irrespective of genotype. No differences in blood telomere length were observed between genotype-positive family members with/without DCM and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Primary genetic testing using multi-gene panels has a low yield and specific assays for structural variants are required if DMD-associated cardiomyopathy is suspected. Distinguishing X-linked causes of DCM from autosomal genes that show sex differences in clinical presentation is crucial for informed family management.

Safety and tolerability of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in bridge-to-transplant patients supported with centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: The safety and tolerability of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with end-stage heart failure supported with left-ventricular-assist-devices (LVADs), irrespective of diabetes mellitus, is not known. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 31 outpatients implanted with LVADs as bridge-to-transplant (BTT) was conducted. Patients with biventricular support, aged under 18 years, who were discharged from the index hospitalisation, or were prescribed SGLT2i prior to their first outpatient clinic were excluded. Patient demographics, laboratory studies, pump haemodynamic and adverse event data was collected. RESULTS: Sixteen (51.6%) of 31 patients were prescribed SGLT2i over median 101.5 days (37.5-190.8). No patients discontinued SGLT2i use or reported attributable adverse symptoms. No significant differences between patients prescribed SGLT2i compared to those SGLT2i-naïve were seen in: [1] renal function; [2] weight; [3] mean arterial pressure. There were numerically lower infection-related (n = 4 vs 7, HR 0.32 (0.08-1.28), p = 0.11) and haemocompatibility-related (n = 3 vs 4, HR 0.52 (0.09-2.83), p = 0.45) adverse events in the SGLT2i group, albeit non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: We found SGLT2i to be safe and well-tolerated in the BTT LVAD cohort with no significant difference in rates of infection or haemocompatibility-related adverse events with SGLT2i use. Larger studies will inform further beneficial effects of SGLT2i prescription in this cohort.

Metabolic Sequelae of Everolimus Treatment After Cardiac Transplant: A Hypothesis-Generating Study.

BACKGROUND: Although modern immunosuppressants improve survival post-transplant, they are associated with long-term metabolic complications, such as post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens using everolimus attenuate some complications such as left ventricular hypertrophy. However, the metabolic effects of everolimus following transplant are less clear. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis to compare PTDM and other metabolic outcomes in participants of a randomised open-label clinical trial of low-dose everolimus and tacrolimus versus standard-dose tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients (RADTAC1 study). RESULTS: There were 39 participants in the trial; mean follow-up was 6.4±1.5 years. There was a high rate of pre-existing diabetes (26%) and newly diagnosed PTDM (36%) during follow-up. Half the patients who developed PTDM in the everolimus-tacrolimus group (n=4/8) ceased diabetes medications during follow-up, which was not observed in patients on standard tacrolimus (n=0/6). In the first 12 months there was a higher use of non-insulin treatment for diabetes in the everolimus-tacrolimus group compared to the standard tacrolimus group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that treatment with everolimus may be associated with improved glycaemic control of PTDM relative to treatment with standard doses of calcineurin inhibitor. These findings should be further studied in prospective randomised trials.

New Drug Targets and Preclinical Modelling Recommendations for Treating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and the primary underlying risk factor for heart failure. Despite decades of research and clinical trials, there are no drugs currently available to prevent organ damage from acute ischaemic injuries of the heart. In order to address the increasing global burden of heart failure, drug, gene, and cell-based regeneration technologies are advancing into clinical testing. In this review we highlight the burden of disease associated with AMI and the therapeutic landscape based on market analyses. New studies revealing the role of acid-sensitive cardiac ion channels and other proton-gated ion channels in cardiac ischaemia are providing renewed interest in pre- and post-conditioning agents with novel mechanisms of action that may also have implications for gene- and cell-based therapeutics. Furthermore, we present guidelines that couple new cell technologies and data resources with traditional animal modelling pipelines to help de-risk drug candidates aimed at treating AMI. We propose that improved preclinical pipelines and increased investment in drug target identification for AMI is critical to stem the increasing global health burden of heart failure.

The role of frailty in advanced HF and cardiac transplantation.

Frailty is a complex, multi-system condition often associated with multimorbidity. It has become an important prognostic maker across a range of conditions and is particularly relevant in patients with cardiovascular disease. Frailty encompasses a range of domains including, physical, psychological, and social. There are currently a range of validated tools available to measure frailty. It is an especially important measurement in advanced HF, because frailty occurs in up to 50% of HF patients and is potentially reversible with therapies such as mechanical circulatory support and transplantation. Moreover, frailty is dynamic, and therefore serial measurements are important. This review delves into the measurement of frailty, mechanisms, and its role in different cardiovascular cohorts. Understanding frailty will help determine patients that will benefit from therapies, as well as prognosticate outcomes.

Tricuspid Regurgitation After Heart Transplantation: The Cause or the Result of Graft Dysfunction?

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common following heart transplantation and has been shown to adversely influence patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify causes of progression to moderate-severe TR in the first 2 y after transplantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of all patients who underwent heart transplantation over a 6-y period. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed at month 0, between 6 and 12 mo, and 1-2 y postoperatively to determine the presence and severity of TR. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were included, of whom 142 underwent TTE before first endomyocardial biopsy. At month 0, 127 (78%) patients had nil-mild TR before first biopsy, whereas 36 (22%) had moderate-severe TR. In patients with nil-mild TR, 9 (7%) progressed to moderate-severe TR by 6 mo and 1 underwent tricuspid valve (TV) surgery. Of patients with moderate-severe TR before first biopsy, by 2 y, 3 had undergone TV surgery. The use of postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the latter group was significant (78%; P < 0.05) as was rejection profile ( P = 0.02). Patients with late progressive moderate-severe TR had a significantly higher 2-y mortality than those who had moderate-severe TR immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study has shown that in the 2 main groups of interest (early moderate-severe TR and progression from nil-mild to moderate-severe TR), TR is more likely to be the result of significant underling graft dysfunction rather than the cause of it.

Rapid triage and transition to telehealth for heart transplant patients in the COVID-19 pandemic setting.

BACKGROUND: In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, a rapid uptake of telehealth services was instituted with the aim of reducing the spread of disease to vulnerable patient populations including heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Single-center, cohort study of all heart transplant patients seen by our institution's transplant program during the first 6 weeks of transition from in-person consultation to telehealth (23 March - 5 June 2020). RESULTS: Face-to-face consultation allocation strongly favored patients in the early post-operative period (34 vs. 242 weeks post-transplant; p < 0.001). Telehealth consultation dramatically reduced patient travel and wait times (80 min per visit saved in telehealth patients). No apparent excess re-hospitalization or mortality was seen in telehealth patients. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate triage, telehealth was feasible in heart transplant recipients, with videoconferencing being the preferred modality. Patients seen face-to-face were those triaged to be higher acuity based on time since transplant and overall clinical status. These patients have the expected higher rates of hospital re-admission, and therefore should continue to be seen in person.

Diabetes medication following heart transplantation: a focus on novel cardioprotective therapies-a joint review from endocrinologists and cardiologists.

There is accumulating evidence that novel glucose-lowering agents infer potent cardiovascular and renal benefits. Therefore, it is imperative to reassess the management of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and consider the role of newer agents. With improved transplant-related survival and high prevalence of post-transplant diabetes, management of long-term complications such as diabetes are increasingly important. There are limited guidelines to assist in choice of appropriate agents after solid organ transplantation. Traditional therapies including insulin and sulfonylureas may still have a role; however, other agents should be considered prior. The evidence of novel glucose-lowering agents in post-transplant care is limited, and most studies have focused on kidney transplant recipients. While there are some parallels between renal and cardiac transplant recipients, the potential cardiovascular benefits, particularly on cardiac fibrosis are unique to cardiac transplantation. The treatment of diabetes, with a focus on additional cardiac and renal benefits, needs to be brought to the forefront of post-transplant care with incorporation of recent evidence outside of transplantation. The role for novel glucose-lowering agents in cardiac transplant recipients will be explored, with a summary of available evidence.

Value of Renal Histology in Predicting Cardiorenal Outcomes in Heart Transplant-listed Patients.

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients requiring mechanical circulatory support and transplantation. There are no validated markers to predict major adverse kidney events (MAKEs), for which simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHKT) could offer improved survival. We evaluate renal histology in predicting MAKEs in transplant-listed patients. Methods: We identified 18 patients with renal histology consistent with CRS from 655 consecutive heart transplant-listed patients between 2010 and 2019. Biopsies were analyzed for glomerular, tubular, interstitial, and arteriolar changes tallied to give a biopsy chronicity score. The primary outcome, MAKE, was a composite of death, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), or estimated glomerular filtration rate decline >50%. These were evaluated at 2 time points: before and following the transplant. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcomes and the need for short-term RRT following the transplant. Results: The mean age was 52.3 y, 22% were female. Five patients did not survive to transplant. One patient underwent successful SHKT. MAKE occurred in 8 of 18 before the transplant and in 8 of 13 following the transplant. Neither outcome was predicted by baseline biochemistry. The biopsy chronicity score was significantly higher in patients with MAKE before transplant (4.3 versus 1.7, P = 0.024) and numerically higher in patients requiring short-term RRT following transplant (3.2 versus 0.7, P = 0.075). Contrary to limited previous literature, interstitial fibrosis did not predict any outcome, whereas tubular atrophy and arteriosclerosis were associated with MAKE before transplant. Conclusions: A higher biopsy chronicity score was associated with adverse kidney endpoints, raising its potential utility over standard biochemistry in considering SHKT referral.

Comparison of six frailty instruments in adults with heart failure: a prospective cohort pilot study.

AIMS: To compare the frailty prevalence and predictive performance of six frailty instruments in adults with heart failure and determine the feasibility of study methods. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective cohort pilot study. Adults aged 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. The Frailty Phenotype; the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe Frailty Instrument (SHARE-FI); St Vincent's Frailty instrument; St Vincent's Frailty instrument plus cognition and mood; The Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, and Loss of Weight (FRAIL) scale; and the Deficit Accumulation Index (DAI) were compared. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop six frailty instrument models to evaluate the association between each frailty instrument and composite all-cause rehospitalization and mortality at 12 months. One hundred and thirty-one patients were included with a mean age of 54 [± 14(SD)]. Frailty prevalence ranged from 33 to 81%. All instruments except one (the FRAIL scale) appeared to signal an increased odds of rehospitalization and/or mortality, yet these results were non-significant. The six frailty instrument models displayed sensitivity between 88-92% and C-statistic values of 0.71-0.73, suggesting satisfactory discrimination. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of frailty varied across six frailty instruments yet was in the higher range despite a 'younger' heart failure cohort. Further research is required to confirm the psychometric properties of these instruments for routine clinical use in an adequately powered and more diverse heart failure cohort.

Pulse pressure within the first 2 days of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is predictive of death prior to hospital discharge, renal dysfunction requiring dialysis and pulmonary oedema.

BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) flows are titrated to achieve adequate perfusion while attempting to ideally maintain arterial pulse pressure (PP). We assessed risk in patients with low PP defined as <10 mmHg within the first 2 days of support. METHODS: Demographics, haemodynamics, echocardiographic and radiological findings were recorded retrospectively in cases conducted between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes were hospital mortality, requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and severe pulmonary oedema (PO). RESULTS: Of 101 patients, 66.3% were male, mean age was 56 (range 18-71 years), mean duration of support was 6.3 days ± 4.1 days, 37.6% died prior to hospital discharge, 39.6% needed RRT and 11.9% had severe PO. Areas under the receiver operating curves of PP at 48 h for hospital mortality, RRT and severe PO were (respectively): 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.80, p = .001), 0.64 (95% CI 0.50-0.77, p = .044), 0.69 (95% CI 0.55-0.82, p = .009). The odds ratio for mortality, RRT, severe PO for those with low PP were (respectively) 2.8 (95% CI 1.01-7.5, p = .04), 3.1 (95% CI 1.11-8.40, p = .026), 7.6 (95% CI 2.06-27.89, p = .001). Central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure were not predictive. CONCLUSION: PP during the first 2 days of support is predictive of clinically important outcomes in patients supported with VA-ECMO.

Heart Transplantation From DCD Donors in Australia: Lessons Learned From the First 74 Cases.

Heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has the potential to substantially increase overall heart transplant activity. The aim of this report is to review the first 8 y of our clinical heart transplant program at St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, to describe how our program has evolved and to report the impact that changes to our retrieval protocols have had on posttransplant outcomes. Since 2014, we have performed 74 DCD heart transplants from DCD donors utilizing a direct procurement protocol followed by normothermic machine perfusion. Changes to our retrieval protocol have resulted in a higher retrieval rate from DCD donors and fewer rejections of DCD hearts during normothermic machine perfusion. Compared with our previously reported early experience in the first 23 transplants, we have observed a significant reduction in the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction from 35% (8/23) to 8% (4/51) in the subsequent 51 transplant recipients ( P < 0.01). The only withdrawal time interval significantly associated with severe primary graft dysfunction was the asystolic warm ischemic time: 15 (12-17) versus 13 (11-14) min ( P < 0.05). One- and 5-y survival of DCD heart transplant recipients was 94% and 88%, comparable to that of a contemporary cohort of donation after brain death recipients: 87 and 81% ( P -value was not significant). In conclusion, heart transplantation from DCD donors has become a major contributor to our overall transplant activity accounting for almost 30% of all transplants performed by our program in the last 2 y, with similar DCD and donation after brain death outcomes.